Letters to the Editor

On “Kicking the Can”

Good afternoon.
We are a subscriber to Coffee Talk Magazine and we have noticed the “kicking” around of steel cans in favor of polybags. I’m writing, not because we are a can manufacturer in the United States who provides tinplated steel packaging to the coffee industry, but because you may be misleading a very environmentally conscious group of consumers to believe that bags are their best packaging choice. Showing smashed and soiled cans on your cover was a slap at our industry and our material.
Steel is the most recycled product in the US and has an infinite life cycle. Steel can be made into another item after recycling without loss of quality and uses less energy than making new. Separation from other waste materials by magnet makes the recycling process highly efficient and lower in cost. There is no better package for shelf appeal and for preservation of freshness.
The foils, plastic valves, and liners of coffee bags make them less recyclable or not recyclable. The paper/poly blend excludes coffee bags from being considered part of paper recycling. Cans can be reused. Bags are not. A number of plastic containers cannot be recycled into secondary products. Even among those that can be (#1 and #2), once the secondary products are used the plastic cannot recycled again. A good resource for support of the steel can facts that I have stated is this website http://steelrecyclingfacts.com/. As a coffee magazine, I’m not sure what is gained by showing a bias toward a particular packaging choice. It is not the same as the full page ads claiming that steel can is not a good contemporary choice. All is fair in marketing.
Donna Sichette
Marketing Specialist
Independent Can Company
1300 Brass Mill Road
Belcamp, MD 21017

On Fair Trade USA and Green Mountain Roasters

An Open Letter to Green Mountain Coffee Roasters From Equal Exchange:
“Please Leave Fair Trade USA”
In a rare business-to-business plea Equal Exchange has released an open letter to Larry Blanford, the CEO of fellow New England specialty coffee company, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) in the form of a full-page color ad in today’s Sunday edition of the Burlington Free Press (Vermont) that strongly encourages the multi-billion dollar brand to withdraw its support from the controversial certification agency, Fair Trade USA (FTUSA).
Equal Exchange is the Massachusetts-headquartered business that introduced Fair Trade coffee to American grocery stores and coffee shops in the 1980s and 90s and who today remains the largest North American enterprise dedicated exclusively to buying and selling Fair Trade products. GMCR, based in Waterbury, VT, was itself an ‘early adopter’ and has been offering Fair Trade coffee for 14 years. To their considerable credit GMCR recently become the world’s largest purveyor of Fair Trade Certified™ coffee, handling more than 26,000,000 pounds of Fair Trade coffee annually. They have also donated generously to support various economic development efforts in coffee growing communities.
However, while acknowledging these accomplishments, in today’s ad Equal Exchange challenges GMCR to “open your eyes…to the controversy raging…” and “leave Fair Trade USA” in light of recent unilateral changes enacted by the agency.
Without input from stakeholders, on January 1, FTUSA abandoned the global Fair Trade system (Fair Trade International, aka FTI) and loosened eligibility rules to allow large coffee, cocoa and sugar plantations to receive Fair Trade certification. That would put these large estates in direct competition with the hundreds of small-farmer co-operatives around the world who co-created the Fair Trade movement and have been the core of Fair Trade for over 25 years. This was a FTUSA proposal that the 20+ other global members of FTI, including the farmer representatives, had overwhelmingly rejected previously. FTUSA also withheld from FTI the dues it owes for 2011, funds that it is now using to compete with FTI in the US certification market.
Equal Exchange, the small-farmer co-operatives, and many other Fair Trade pioneers and advocates believe these and other recent acts by FTUSA gravely undermine the very purpose of Fair Trade and constitute a betrayal of the small-farmer co-ops. Consequently, they also undermine the important social and economic progress that GMCR’s support of Fair Trade and small farmers has to date made possible. The open letter goes on to state,
“Fair Trade, a product of years of sweat, sacrifice and risk, belongs to the farmers. But Fair Trade USA has abandoned the legitimate system, not paid its dues, and changed the rules…”
Rink Dickinson & Rob Everts, co-presidents, Equal Exchange
In different forums, Equal Exchange has been challenging the path taken by FTUSA, including a recent private meeting with Larry Blanford and others at GMCR. Because of GMCR’s large volume of Fair Trade sales, and the licensing fees it pays for use of the FTUSA seal, it is the largest single source of revenue for FTUSA and a critical pillar of support. Those funds, and the benefits of being associated with the popular GMCR brand, are aiding FTUSA’s efforts even as it pursues a course apart from the rest of the global Fair Trade movement. Therefore, Equal Exchange is using this ad, and a subsequent ad that will run on Thursday, May 24th, to publicly encourage GMCR to end its relationship with FTUSA and rejoin the global system of certifiers that FTUSA recently left.
About Equal Exchange
Equal Exchange has been a pioneer and U.S. market leader in Fair Trade since 1986 and is a full service provider of organic coffee, tea, chocolate, cocoa, bananas, and other products. 100% of Equal Exchange products are fairly traded, benefiting more than 40 small farmer co-operatives in 25 countries around the world. In keeping with its Fair Trade mission Equal Exchange is a democratically governed, employee-owned co-operative, one of only a few in the US. Equal Exchange has been honored for its social entrepreneurship by Fast Company magazine, The Financial Times, WorldBlu and others.

Suggested Reading